The Case Of Brady V. Maryland - 1857 Words

There are several cases that have gone through the United States Supreme Court where prosecutors have not disclosed evidence to the defense, that could in turn help the defense’s case such as in the case of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963),† the U.S. Supreme Court held that the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment, irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution† (Judge, 2015). Other cases that show where officers of the courts credibility is put into question can be found in United States v. Bagley where â€Å"also clarified that impeachment evidence must be disclosed to the defense† (Judge, 2015), this had to do with police informants who the defense could have impeached their testimony, and in the case of Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419 (1995), â€Å"imposed upon the prosecutor an affirmative duty to learn of any favorable evidence known to the others acting on the government s behalf, including the police, and a resulting duty to disclose that evidence to the defense† (Judge, 2015). The above mentioned cases all deal in some form with a person’s right to be able to have a fair trial when they are charged with a crime, and shows examples where the prosecution is required to disclose all evidence even when it is in favor of a defendant. It is important that police officers be ethical especially while on the job. An officer’sShow MoreRelatedBrady V. Maryland, 373 U.s. 83887 Words   |  4 PagesBrady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) This case came about because John Brady was convicted and sentenced for the crime of murder along with another man, and it was found after the sentencing that the prosecutor did not turn over a crucial piece of evidence to the defense which included a confession by the other man. During the appeal process on behalf of Mr. Brady the â€Å"Court of Appeals held that suppression of the evidence by the prosecution denied petitioner due process of law and remanded theRead MoreBrady Vs. Maryland Case968 Words   |  4 PagesBrady Vs Maryland Brady vs. Maryland was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the prosecution had withheld from the criminal defendant certain evidence. The defendant faced his conviction, arguing it had been contrary to the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Maryland prosecuted Brady and a companion, Boblit, for murder. Brady admitted being involved in the murder, but claimed Boblit had done the actual killing. The prosecution had withheldRead MoreThe Pre Trial Process1592 Words   |  7 Pagespreliminary hearing. The right to a preliminary examination is made up of different sections of Amendments to the United States Constitution. The preliminary examination is a preliminary hearing to determine if there is probable cause justifying sending a case to trial. During this hearing a defendant accused of committing a crime has the right of a trial by jury. A defendant has a right to remain silent and this cannot be used against him. No person can be forced to testify against themselves. A defendantRead MoreOrigins Of The United States1260 Words   |  6 Pagesapplication of the law with respect to the myriad and complexity of cases that are heard before the Court. Two such cases in which there was witnessed a distinct ideological change in the opinion of the Supreme Court with respect to the Sixth Amendment include Betts v. Brady (1942) and Gideon v. Wainwright (1963).2 These two cases pondered and deliberated the argument over the course of twenty-one years as to whether defendants in a criminal case are entitled to court appointed counsel under the guaranteesRead MoreThe People versus Tyronne Johnson1116 Words   |  4 PagesThe Assistant District Attorney, Queens County, New York, Claude Stuart was the lead prosecutor in a murder case, titled, People v. Tyronne Johnson. Johnson was tried for the murder of Leroy Vann Tony. Johnson was convicted of murder and sentenced to the term of 20 years to life. After serving 13 years of the prison sentence, the conviction of the defendant was overturned. There was a determination that the prosecutor, Claude Stuart withheld evidence from the defense which was the reason theRead MoreEthics : Ethics And Credibility1111 Words   |  5 Pagesavoid punishment, to save fac e or even to make their cases look better can lead to termination of their employment. As in Proverbs 11:3 (ESV) â€Å"The integrity of the upright guides them, but the crookedness of the treacherous destroys them†. One lie by a law enforcement officer can destroy them and not only that but it makes the department that they work for lack credibility when they need it the most such as having the ability to testify in a court case, and it makes the pubic question the whole departmentRead More Gideon Vs. Wainwright Essay691 Words   |  3 Pages United States Supreme Court cases are argued and decided on Constitutional grounds. All arguments and decisions are based on interpretations of the original Constitution and, more often, on Constitutional amendments. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;GIDEON v. WAINWRIGHT nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;In June 1961, Clarence Gideon was arrested and charged with breaking and entering in Bay Harbor. He was tried in a Florida Circuit Court in August 1961. Gideon stated in Court that he was unable to affordRead MoreHow The Justice System Is Run? Essay1211 Words   |  5 Pagesthe case. Investigations are often susceptible to mistakes, human error and an array of outside factors they have little to no control over. The varying factors in each investigation can sometimes create a situation that ultimately leads to a wrongful conviction. There are also people in the justice system that deliberately fabricate information or evidence, manipulate a situation or witness, or influence the case in some way to achieve the outcome they desire. The prevalence, causes and cases ofRead MoreViolation of Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Rights542 Words   |  2 PagesFACTS Appellant Brady was found guilty of first degree murder by the Maryland Court system. During his trial hearing Brady admitted to participating in the organization and forethought of the crime with a partner, although plead that he himself did not commit the crime. After disclosing his involvement, Brady’s lawyer admitted to his guilt but asked for a lesser penalty since Brady didn’t commit the murder. Before trial Brady’s council asked for all relevant information to the trial and were givenRead MoreThe Role Of Dna Analyst On The Rights Of The Defendant1827 Words   |  8 Pagesare outlined by the laws of the federal and state governments. The prosecution must share every element of their case against the defendant with the defense. There are variations in terms of the responsibility of the defense to share their case materials. Traditionally, the defense shares the reports and opinions of their experts along with any other documents pertaining to the case. There are certain terms that help a scientist to understand the process of the court. First, a scientific expert